FUQUA v. MISSISSIPPI, 372 U.S. 709 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court
FUQUA v. MISSISSIPPI, 372 U.S. 709 (1963) 372 U.S. 709FUQUA v. MISSISSIPPI. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI. No. 854. Decided April 15, 1963.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
Reported below: ___ Miss. ___, 145 So.2d 152.
E. H. Cunningham, Jr. for appellant.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
U.S. Supreme Court
COLLINS v. CALIFORNIA, 372 U.S. 709 (1963) 372 U.S. 709 COLLINS v. CALIFORNIA. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT. No. 599, Misc. Decided April 15, 1963. Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded. Reported below: 203 Cal. App. 2d 611, 21 Cal. Rptr. 783. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353. MR. JUSTICE CLARK and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN dissent for the reasons stated in their opinions in Douglas v. California, 372 U.S., at 358, 360.
U.S. Supreme Court
FUQUA v. MISSISSIPPI, 372 U.S. 709 (1963) 372 U.S. 709FUQUA v. MISSISSIPPI. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI. No. 854. Decided April 15, 1963.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
Reported below: ___ Miss. ___, 145 So.2d 152.
E. H. Cunningham, Jr. for appellant.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
U.S. Supreme Court
COLLINS v. CALIFORNIA, 372 U.S. 709 (1963) 372 U.S. 709 COLLINS v. CALIFORNIA. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT. No. 599, Misc. Decided April 15, 1963. Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded. Reported below: 203 Cal. App. 2d 611, 21 Cal. Rptr. 783. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353. MR. JUSTICE CLARK and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN dissent for the reasons stated in their opinions in Douglas v. California, 372 U.S., at 358, 360.
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
