BIRMINGHAM ICE & COLD STORAGE v. SOUTHERN RAILWAY, 372 U.S. 524 (1963)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

BIRMINGHAM ICE & COLD STORAGE v. SOUTHERN RAILWAY, 372 U.S. 524 (1963)

372 U.S. 524

BIRMINGHAM ICE & COLD STORAGE CO. ET AL. v. SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO. ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
ALABAMA. No. 425.
Decided March 18, 1963.

Appeal dismissed.

Reported below: 205 F. Supp. 640.

David J. Vann and A. Alvis Layne for appellants.

Jos. F. Johnston for Southern Railway Co. et al., and James W. Wrape and Glenn M. Elliott for Jefferson Warehouse & Cold Storage Co. et al., appellees.

Solicitor General Cox filed a memorandum for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 372 U.S. 524, 525




U.S. Supreme Court

BIRMINGHAM ICE & COLD STORAGE v. SOUTHERN RAILWAY, 372 U.S. 524 (1963)

372 U.S. 524

BIRMINGHAM ICE & COLD STORAGE CO. ET AL. v. SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO. ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
ALABAMA. No. 425.
Decided March 18, 1963.

Appeal dismissed.

Reported below: 205 F. Supp. 640.

David J. Vann and A. Alvis Layne for appellants.

Jos. F. Johnston for Southern Railway Co. et al., and James W. Wrape and Glenn M. Elliott for Jefferson Warehouse & Cold Storage Co. et al., appellees.

Solicitor General Cox filed a memorandum for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 372 U.S. 524, 525

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.