MACHINISTS v. ELECTRICAL WORKERS, 372 U.S. 523 (1963)

U.S. Supreme Court

MACHINISTS v. ELECTRICAL WORKERS, 372 U.S. 523 (1963)

372 U.S. 523

LOCAL LODGE NO. 1836, DISTRICT 38, INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS,
AFL-CIO, ET AL. v. LOCAL NO. 1505, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF
ELECTRICAL WORKERS, AFL-CIO, ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT. No. 419.
Decided March 18, 1963.

Judgment vacated and case remanded to District Court with directions to dismiss the cause as moot.

Reported below: 304 F.2d 365.

Robert M. Segal and Plato E. Papps for petitioners.

Paul F. Hannah for Raytheon Company, respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to vacate is granted. The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts with directions to dismiss the cause as moot. Black v. Amen, 355 U.S. 600.

Page 372 U.S. 523, 524




U.S. Supreme Court

MACHINISTS v. ELECTRICAL WORKERS, 372 U.S. 523 (1963)

372 U.S. 523

LOCAL LODGE NO. 1836, DISTRICT 38, INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS,
AFL-CIO, ET AL. v. LOCAL NO. 1505, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF
ELECTRICAL WORKERS, AFL-CIO, ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT. No. 419.
Decided March 18, 1963.

Judgment vacated and case remanded to District Court with directions to dismiss the cause as moot.

Reported below: 304 F.2d 365.

Robert M. Segal and Plato E. Papps for petitioners.

Paul F. Hannah for Raytheon Company, respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to vacate is granted. The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts with directions to dismiss the cause as moot. Black v. Amen, 355 U.S. 600.

Page 372 U.S. 523, 524

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.