CRAIG v. BENNETT, 372 U.S. 521 (1963)

U.S. Supreme Court

CRAIG v. BENNETT, 372 U.S. 521 (1963) 372 U.S. 521

CRAIG v. BENNETT, WARDEN.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA.
No. 841, Misc.
Decided March 18, 1963.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 372 U.S. 521, 522

COLE v. MANNING, <a href="/cases/federal/us/372/521/case.html">372 U.S. 521</a> (1963) 372 U.S. 521 (1963) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

COLE v. MANNING, 372 U.S. 521 (1963) 372 U.S. 521

COLE ET AL. v. MANNING, PENITENTIARY SUPERINTENDENT.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH CAROLINA.
No. 610, Misc.
Decided March 18, 1963.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 240 S. C. 260, 125 S.E.2d 621.

Theodore W. Law, Jr. for appellants.

Daniel R. McLeod, Attorney General of South Carolina, and Victor S. Evans, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

 


U.S. Supreme Court

CRAIG v. BENNETT, 372 U.S. 521 (1963) 372 U.S. 521

CRAIG v. BENNETT, WARDEN.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA.
No. 841, Misc.
Decided March 18, 1963.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 372 U.S. 521, 522

COLE v. MANNING, <a href="/cases/federal/us/372/521/case.html"><a class="related-case" href="https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/372/521/"><a class="related-case" href="https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/372/521/">372 U.S. 521</a></a></a> (1963) 372 U.S. 521 (1963) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

COLE v. MANNING, 372 U.S. 521 (1963) 372 U.S. 521

COLE ET AL. v. MANNING, PENITENTIARY SUPERINTENDENT.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH CAROLINA.
No. 610, Misc.
Decided March 18, 1963.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 240 S. C. 260, 125 S.E.2d 621.

Theodore W. Law, Jr. for appellants.

Daniel R. McLeod, Attorney General of South Carolina, and Victor S. Evans, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.