WHITE STAG MANUFACTURING CO. v. ELLIS, 372 U.S. 251 (1963)

U.S. Supreme Court

WHITE STAG MANUFACTURING CO. v. ELLIS, 372 U.S. 251 (1963)

372 U.S. 251

WHITE STAG MANUFACTURING CO. v. ELLIS ET AL., MEMBERS OF THE STATE TAX
COMMISSION OF OREGON.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OREGON. No. 708.
Decided February 25, 1963.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 232 Ore. 94, 373 P.2d 999.

Walter H. Evans, Jr. for appellant.

Robert Y. Thornton, Attorney General of Oregon, and Carlisle B. Roberts and Gerald F. Bartz, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.


PATTERSON v. CITY OF DALLAS, <a href="/cases/federal/us/372/251/case.html">372 U.S. 251</a> (1963) 372 U.S. 251 (1963) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

PATTERSON v. CITY OF DALLAS, 372 U.S. 251 (1963)

372 U.S. 251

PATTERSON ET AL. v. CITY OF DALLAS.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF TEXAS, FIFTH SUPREME JUDICIAL
DISTRICT. No. 712.
Decided February 25, 1963.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 355 S. W. 2d 838.

Robert C. Cox for appellants.

H. P. Kucera and Ted P. MacMaster for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 372 U.S. 251, 252




U.S. Supreme Court

WHITE STAG MANUFACTURING CO. v. ELLIS, 372 U.S. 251 (1963)

372 U.S. 251

WHITE STAG MANUFACTURING CO. v. ELLIS ET AL., MEMBERS OF THE STATE TAX
COMMISSION OF OREGON.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OREGON. No. 708.
Decided February 25, 1963.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 232 Ore. 94, 373 P.2d 999.

Walter H. Evans, Jr. for appellant.

Robert Y. Thornton, Attorney General of Oregon, and Carlisle B. Roberts and Gerald F. Bartz, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.


PATTERSON v. CITY OF DALLAS, <a href="/cases/federal/us/372/251/case.html">372 U.S. 251</a> (1963) 372 U.S. 251 (1963) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

PATTERSON v. CITY OF DALLAS, 372 U.S. 251 (1963)

372 U.S. 251

PATTERSON ET AL. v. CITY OF DALLAS.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF TEXAS, FIFTH SUPREME JUDICIAL
DISTRICT. No. 712.
Decided February 25, 1963.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 355 S. W. 2d 838.

Robert C. Cox for appellants.

H. P. Kucera and Ted P. MacMaster for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 372 U.S. 251, 252

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.