SHELDON v. FANNIN, 372 U.S. 228 (1963)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

SHELDON v. FANNIN, 372 U.S. 228 (1963)

372 U.S. 228

SHELDON ET AL. v. FANNIN ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA.
No. 656.
Decided February 18, 1963.

Appeal dismissed.

Reported below: 214 F. Supp. 940.

Hayden C. Covington for appellants.

Robert W. Pickrell, Attorney General of Arizona, and Frank Sagarino, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed.

Page 372 U.S. 228, 229

 


U.S. Supreme Court

SHELDON v. FANNIN, 372 U.S. 228 (1963)

372 U.S. 228

SHELDON ET AL. v. FANNIN ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA.
No. 656.
Decided February 18, 1963.

Appeal dismissed.

Reported below: 214 F. Supp. 940.

Hayden C. Covington for appellants.

Robert W. Pickrell, Attorney General of Arizona, and Frank Sagarino, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed.

Page 372 U.S. 228, 229

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.