PRESSER v. UNITED STATES, 371 U.S. 71 (1962)

U.S. Supreme Court

PRESSER v. UNITED STATES, 371 U.S. 71 (1962)

371 U.S. 71

PRESSER v. UNITED STATES.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT.
No. 25.
Argued March 22, 26, 1962. Restored to the calendar for reargument April 2, 1962. Reargued October 8, 1962.
Decided November 13, 1962.

Judgment affirmed by an equally divided Court.

Reported below: 292 F.2d 171.

John G. Cardinal reargued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Edwin Knachel and Robert E. Freed.

Stephen J. Pollak reargued the cause for the United States. On the briefs were Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg and Sidney M. Glazer.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

MR. JUSTICE GOLDBERG took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 371 U.S. 71, 72




U.S. Supreme Court

PRESSER v. UNITED STATES, 371 U.S. 71 (1962)

371 U.S. 71

PRESSER v. UNITED STATES.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT.
No. 25.
Argued March 22, 26, 1962. Restored to the calendar for reargument April 2, 1962. Reargued October 8, 1962.
Decided November 13, 1962.

Judgment affirmed by an equally divided Court.

Reported below: 292 F.2d 171.

John G. Cardinal reargued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Edwin Knachel and Robert E. Freed.

Stephen J. Pollak reargued the cause for the United States. On the briefs were Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg and Sidney M. Glazer.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

MR. JUSTICE GOLDBERG took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 371 U.S. 71, 72

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.