UNITED STATES v. BLISS & LAUGHLIN, INC., 371 U.S. 70 (1962)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

UNITED STATES v. BLISS & LAUGHLIN, INC., 371 U.S. 70 (1962)

371 U.S. 70

UNITED STATES v. BLISS & LAUGHLIN, INC.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 367.
Decided November 5, 1962.

Judgment vacated and case remanded for reconsideration in light of Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294.

Reported below: 202 F. Supp. 334.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger and Lionel Kestenbaum for the United States.

W. Donald McSweeney and Maurice Jones, Jr. for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for reconsideration in light of Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294.

Page 371 U.S. 70, 71

 


U.S. Supreme Court

UNITED STATES v. BLISS & LAUGHLIN, INC., 371 U.S. 70 (1962)

371 U.S. 70

UNITED STATES v. BLISS & LAUGHLIN, INC.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 367.
Decided November 5, 1962.

Judgment vacated and case remanded for reconsideration in light of Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294.

Reported below: 202 F. Supp. 334.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger and Lionel Kestenbaum for the United States.

W. Donald McSweeney and Maurice Jones, Jr. for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for reconsideration in light of Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294.

Page 371 U.S. 70, 71

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.