UNITED STATES v. BLISS & LAUGHLIN, INC., 371 U.S. 70 (1962)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
UNITED STATES v. BLISS & LAUGHLIN, INC., 371 U.S. 70 (1962) 371 U.S. 70UNITED STATES v. BLISS & LAUGHLIN,
INC.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 367.
Decided November 5, 1962.
Judgment vacated and case remanded for reconsideration in light of Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294.
Reported below: 202 F. Supp. 334.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger and Lionel Kestenbaum for the United States.
W. Donald McSweeney and Maurice Jones, Jr. for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for reconsideration in light of Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294.
Opinions
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 367.
Decided November 5, 1962.
Judgment vacated and case remanded for reconsideration in light of Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294. Reported below: 202 F. Supp. 334. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger and Lionel Kestenbaum for the United States. W. Donald McSweeney and Maurice Jones, Jr. for appellee. PER CURIAM. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for reconsideration in light of Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294. Page 371 U.S. 70, 71
U.S. Supreme Court
UNITED STATES v. BLISS & LAUGHLIN, INC., 371 U.S. 70 (1962) 371 U.S. 70 UNITED STATES v. BLISS & LAUGHLIN, INC.APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 367.
Decided November 5, 1962.
Judgment vacated and case remanded for reconsideration in light of Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294. Reported below: 202 F. Supp. 334. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger and Lionel Kestenbaum for the United States. W. Donald McSweeney and Maurice Jones, Jr. for appellee. PER CURIAM. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for reconsideration in light of Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294. Page 371 U.S. 70, 71
Search This Case
