BROOKSHIRE v. CONTESTIBLE, 371 U.S. 68 (1962)
U.S. Supreme Court
BROOKSHIRE v. CONTESTIBLE, 371 U.S. 68 (1962) 371 U.S. 68 BROOKSHIRE v. CONTESTIBLE, ADMINISTRATRIX.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI.
No. 352.
Decided November 5, 1962.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
Reported below: 355 S.W.2d 36.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
U.S. Supreme Court
GRISANTI v. CITY OF CLEVELAND, 371 U.S. 68 (1962) 371 U.S. 68 GRISANTI v. CITY OF CLEVELAND ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
No. 353.
Decided November 5, 1962.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 173 Ohio St. 386, 182 N.E.2d 568.
George J. McMonagle and Richard E. McMonagle for appellant.
Joseph H. Crowley, Henry J. Crawford and John Lansdale for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
BROOKSHIRE v. CONTESTIBLE, 371 U.S. 68 (1962) 371 U.S. 68 BROOKSHIRE v. CONTESTIBLE, ADMINISTRATRIX.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI.
No. 352.
Decided November 5, 1962.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
Reported below: 355 S.W.2d 36.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
U.S. Supreme Court
GRISANTI v. CITY OF CLEVELAND, 371 U.S. 68 (1962) 371 U.S. 68 GRISANTI v. CITY OF CLEVELAND ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
No. 353.
Decided November 5, 1962.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 173 Ohio St. 386, 182 N.E.2d 568.
George J. McMonagle and Richard E. McMonagle for appellant.
Joseph H. Crowley, Henry J. Crawford and John Lansdale for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Page 371 U.S. 68, 69
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
