BROOKSHIRE v. MISSOURI, 371 U.S. 67 (1962)
U.S. Supreme Court
BROOKSHIRE v. MISSOURI, 371 U.S. 67 (1962)
371 U.S. 67 BROOKSHIRE v. MISSOURI.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI.
No. 351.
Decided November 5, 1962.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
Reported below: 353 S. W. 2d 681.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
U.S. Supreme Court
CITIZENS UTILITIES CO. OF CALIFORNIA v. SUPERIOR COURT, 371 U.S. 67 (1962)
371 U.S. 67 CITIZENS UTILITIES CO. OF CALIFORNIA v. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
FOR SACRAMENTO COUNTY ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT. No. 330.
Decided November 5, 1962.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Alvin H. Pelavin for appellant.
Martin McDonough for City of North Sacramento, appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
BROOKSHIRE v. MISSOURI, 371 U.S. 67 (1962)
371 U.S. 67 BROOKSHIRE v. MISSOURI.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI.
No. 351.
Decided November 5, 1962.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
Reported below: 353 S. W. 2d 681.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
U.S. Supreme Court
CITIZENS UTILITIES CO. OF CALIFORNIA v. SUPERIOR COURT, 371 U.S. 67 (1962)
371 U.S. 67 CITIZENS UTILITIES CO. OF CALIFORNIA v. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
FOR SACRAMENTO COUNTY ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT. No. 330.
Decided November 5, 1962.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Alvin H. Pelavin for appellant.
Martin McDonough for City of North Sacramento, appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
