STUART v. WILSON
371 U.S. 576 (1963)

 Annotate this Case
  • Syllabus  | 
  • Case

U.S. Supreme Court

STUART v. WILSON, 371 U.S. 576 (1963)

371 U.S. 576

STUART ET AL. v. WILSON, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. No. 543.
Decided January 21, 1963.

211 F. Supp. 700, affirmed.

James L. McNees, Jr. for appellants.

Will Wilson, Attorney General of Texas, Sam R. Wilson, Assistant Attorney General, and Tom I. McFarling, Special Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

BARDY v. UNITED STATES, <a href="/cases/federal/us/371/576/case.html">371 U.S. 576</a> (1963) 371 U.S. 576 (1963) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

BARDY v. UNITED STATES, 371 U.S. 576 (1963)

371 U.S. 576

BARDY v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 603.
Decided January 21, 1963.

Appeal dismissed.

Morton R. Galane for appellant.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger, Robert B. Hummel and Irwin A. Seibel for the United States, and Albert C. Bickford for MCA Inc., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed.

Page 371 U.S. 576, 577




Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.