STUART v. WILSON,
371 U.S. 576 (1963)
Annotate this Case
- Syllabus |
- Case
U.S. Supreme Court
STUART v. WILSON, 371 U.S. 576 (1963)
371 U.S. 576 STUART ET AL. v. WILSON, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. No. 543.
Decided January 21, 1963.
211 F. Supp. 700, affirmed.
James L. McNees, Jr. for appellants.
Will Wilson, Attorney General of Texas, Sam R. Wilson, Assistant Attorney General, and Tom I. McFarling, Special Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
U.S. Supreme Court
BARDY v. UNITED STATES, 371 U.S. 576 (1963)
371 U.S. 576 BARDY v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 603.
Decided January 21, 1963.
Appeal dismissed.
Morton R. Galane for appellant.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger, Robert B. Hummel and Irwin A. Seibel for the United States, and Albert C. Bickford for MCA Inc., appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed.
