DITSON v. CALIFORNIA, 371 U.S. 541 (1963)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

DITSON v. CALIFORNIA, 371 U.S. 541 (1963)

371 U.S. 541

DITSON v. CALIFORNIA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 729, Misc.
Decided January 14, 1963.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and cause remanded.

Hugh R. Manes for petitioner.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. In view of the suggestion of mootness by reason of the execution of the petitioner, the judgment of the Supreme Court of California is vacated and the cause is remanded for such proceedings as that court may deem appropriate.

[NOTE: Upon petition by the State for rehearing or clarification, the above opinion was withdrawn and, upon the prior suggestion of mootness, the petition for writ of certiorari was dismissed. 372 U.S. 933.]

Page 371 U.S. 541, 542

 


U.S. Supreme Court

DITSON v. CALIFORNIA, 371 U.S. 541 (1963)

371 U.S. 541

DITSON v. CALIFORNIA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 729, Misc.
Decided January 14, 1963.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and cause remanded.

Hugh R. Manes for petitioner.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. In view of the suggestion of mootness by reason of the execution of the petitioner, the judgment of the Supreme Court of California is vacated and the cause is remanded for such proceedings as that court may deem appropriate.

[NOTE: Upon petition by the State for rehearing or clarification, the above opinion was withdrawn and, upon the prior suggestion of mootness, the petition for writ of certiorari was dismissed. 372 U.S. 933.]

Page 371 U.S. 541, 542

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.