ALABAMA v. UNITED STATES, 371 U.S. 37 (1962)

U.S. Supreme Court

ALABAMA v. UNITED STATES, 371 U.S. 37 (1962)

371 U.S. 37

ALABAMA ET AL. v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF
APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 324.
Decided October 22, 1962.

Certiorari granted and judgment affirmed.

Reported below: 304 F.2d 583.

MacDonald Gallion, Attorney General of Alabama, and Willard W. Livingston, Leslie Hall and Gordon Madison, Assistant Attorneys General, for petitioners.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Marshall, Harold H. Greene and David Rubin for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is affirmed. United States v. Thomas, 362 U.S. 58.

Page 371 U.S. 37, 38

 


U.S. Supreme Court

ALABAMA v. UNITED STATES, 371 U.S. 37 (1962)

371 U.S. 37

ALABAMA ET AL. v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF
APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 324.
Decided October 22, 1962.

Certiorari granted and judgment affirmed.

Reported below: 304 F.2d 583.

MacDonald Gallion, Attorney General of Alabama, and Willard W. Livingston, Leslie Hall and Gordon Madison, Assistant Attorneys General, for petitioners.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Marshall, Harold H. Greene and David Rubin for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is affirmed. United States v. Thomas, 362 U.S. 58.

Page 371 U.S. 37, 38

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.