BOSTON & MAINE RAILROAD v. UNITED STATES, 371 U.S. 26 (1962)

U.S. Supreme Court

BOSTON & MAINE RAILROAD v. UNITED STATES, 371 U.S. 26 (1962)

371 U.S. 26

BOSTON & MAINE RAILROAD ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF
MASSACHUSETTS. No. 230.
Decided October 15, 1962.

208 F. Supp. 661, affirmed.

Joseph F. Eshelman, James Garfield, Conrad W. Oberdorfer, Kenneth H. Lundmark, R. G. Bleakney, Jr., R. D. Brooks, R. B. Claytor, E. A. Kaier, W. T. Pierson and D. M. Tolmie for appellants.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger, Robert B. Hummel, Elliott H. Moyer and Robert W. Ginnane for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission.

R. Wray Henriott, W. L. Grubbs and Joseph L. Lenihan for the Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co. et al., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE WHITE took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 371 U.S. 26, 27




U.S. Supreme Court

BOSTON & MAINE RAILROAD v. UNITED STATES, 371 U.S. 26 (1962)

371 U.S. 26

BOSTON & MAINE RAILROAD ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF
MASSACHUSETTS. No. 230.
Decided October 15, 1962.

208 F. Supp. 661, affirmed.

Joseph F. Eshelman, James Garfield, Conrad W. Oberdorfer, Kenneth H. Lundmark, R. G. Bleakney, Jr., R. D. Brooks, R. B. Claytor, E. A. Kaier, W. T. Pierson and D. M. Tolmie for appellants.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger, Robert B. Hummel, Elliott H. Moyer and Robert W. Ginnane for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission.

R. Wray Henriott, W. L. Grubbs and Joseph L. Lenihan for the Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co. et al., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE WHITE took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 371 U.S. 26, 27

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.