WASSERMANN v. BOARD OF REGENTS, UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK, 371 U.S. 23 (1962)
U.S. Supreme Court
WASSERMANN v. BOARD OF REGENTS, UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK, 371 U.S. 23 (1962)
371 U.S. 23 WASSERMANN v. BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF THE
STATE OF NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK. No. 312.
Decided October 15, 1962.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 11 N. Y. 2d 173, 182 N. E. 2d 264.
Jacob Rassner for appellant.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
MILLER v. LAKE, 371 U.S. 23 (1962)
371 U.S. 23 MILLER v. LAKE, SECRETARY OF STATE OF TEXAS.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS.
No. 415.
Decided October 15, 1962.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
John J. Herrera for appellant.
Will Wilson, Attorney General of Texas, and William E. Allen and H. Grady Chandler, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
WASSERMANN v. BOARD OF REGENTS, UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK, 371 U.S. 23 (1962)
371 U.S. 23 WASSERMANN v. BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF THE
STATE OF NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK. No. 312.
Decided October 15, 1962.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 11 N. Y. 2d 173, 182 N. E. 2d 264.
Jacob Rassner for appellant.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
MILLER v. LAKE, 371 U.S. 23 (1962)
371 U.S. 23 MILLER v. LAKE, SECRETARY OF STATE OF TEXAS.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS.
No. 415.
Decided October 15, 1962.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
John J. Herrera for appellant.
Will Wilson, Attorney General of Texas, and William E. Allen and H. Grady Chandler, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
