NATIONAL MOTOR FREIGHT v. U.S., 371 U.S. 223 (1962)

U.S. Supreme Court

NATIONAL MOTOR FREIGHT v. U.S., 371 U.S. 223 (1962)

371 U.S. 223

NATIONAL MOTOR FREIGHT TRAFFIC ASSOCIATION, INC., ET AL. v.
UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 479.
Decided December 17, 1962.

205 F. Supp. 592, affirmed.

Bryce Rea, Jr. and Frederick A. Babson, Jr. for appellants.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger, Robert B. Hummel, Robert W. Ginnane and Fritz R. Kahn for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission.

D. Robert Thomas, Harry C. Ames, Sr., Giles Morrow, S. Sidney Eisen and James L. Givan for appellee freight forwarders.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE STEWART is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Page 371 U.S. 223, 224




U.S. Supreme Court

NATIONAL MOTOR FREIGHT v. U.S., 371 U.S. 223 (1962)

371 U.S. 223

NATIONAL MOTOR FREIGHT TRAFFIC ASSOCIATION, INC., ET AL. v.
UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 479.
Decided December 17, 1962.

205 F. Supp. 592, affirmed.

Bryce Rea, Jr. and Frederick A. Babson, Jr. for appellants.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger, Robert B. Hummel, Robert W. Ginnane and Fritz R. Kahn for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission.

D. Robert Thomas, Harry C. Ames, Sr., Giles Morrow, S. Sidney Eisen and James L. Givan for appellee freight forwarders.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE STEWART is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Page 371 U.S. 223, 224

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.