UNITED STATES v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE OF ILLINOIS
371 U.S. 21 (1962)

 Annotate this Case
  • Syllabus  | 
  • Case

U.S. Supreme Court

UNITED STATES v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE OF ILLINOIS, 371 U.S. 21 (1962)

371 U.S. 21

UNITED STATES ET AL. v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE OF ILLINOIS ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 235.
Decided October 15, 1962.

202 F. Supp. 757, affirmed.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Oberdorfer, I. Henry Kutz and William Massar for the United States.

John H. Caruthers for Olin Mathieson Chemical Corp., appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed.

SOUTHEASTERN AVIATION, INC., v. HURD, ADMINISTRATOR, <a href="/cases/federal/us/371/21/case.html">371 U.S. 21</a> (1962) 371 U.S. 21 (1962) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

SOUTHEASTERN AVIATION, INC., v. HURD, ADMINISTRATOR, 371 U.S. 21 (1962)

371 U.S. 21

SOUTHEASTERN AVIATION, INC., DOING BUSINESS AS SOUTHEAST AIRLINES,
v. HURD. ADMINISTRATOR.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE, EASTERN DIVISION. No. 286.
Decided October 15, 1962.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 209 Tenn. 639, 355 S. W. 2d 436.

Russell R. Kramer and Erma Griffith Greenwood for appellant.

Howard E. Wilson and Preston H. Taylor for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 371 U.S. 21, 22




Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.