UNITED STATES v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE OF ILLINOIS, 371 U.S. 21 (1962)
U.S. Supreme Court
UNITED STATES v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE OF ILLINOIS, 371 U.S. 21 (1962) 371 U.S. 21 UNITED STATES ET AL. v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE OF ILLINOIS ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 235.
Decided October 15, 1962.
202 F. Supp. 757, affirmed.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Oberdorfer, I. Henry Kutz and William Massar for the United States.
John H. Caruthers for Olin Mathieson Chemical Corp., appellant.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed.
U.S. Supreme Court
SOUTHEASTERN AVIATION, INC., v. HURD, ADMINISTRATOR, 371 U.S. 21 (1962) 371 U.S. 21 SOUTHEASTERN AVIATION, INC., DOING BUSINESS AS SOUTHEAST AIRLINES,
v. HURD. ADMINISTRATOR.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE, EASTERN DIVISION. No. 286.
Decided October 15, 1962.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 209 Tenn. 639, 355 S.W.2d 436.
Russell R. Kramer and Erma Griffith Greenwood for appellant.
Howard E. Wilson and Preston H. Taylor for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
UNITED STATES v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE OF ILLINOIS, 371 U.S. 21 (1962) 371 U.S. 21 UNITED STATES ET AL. v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE OF ILLINOIS ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 235.
Decided October 15, 1962.
202 F. Supp. 757, affirmed.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Oberdorfer, I. Henry Kutz and William Massar for the United States.
John H. Caruthers for Olin Mathieson Chemical Corp., appellant.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed.
U.S. Supreme Court
SOUTHEASTERN AVIATION, INC., v. HURD, ADMINISTRATOR, 371 U.S. 21 (1962) 371 U.S. 21 SOUTHEASTERN AVIATION, INC., DOING BUSINESS AS SOUTHEAST AIRLINES,
v. HURD. ADMINISTRATOR.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE, EASTERN DIVISION. No. 286.
Decided October 15, 1962.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 209 Tenn. 639, 355 S.W.2d 436.
Russell R. Kramer and Erma Griffith Greenwood for appellant.
Howard E. Wilson and Preston H. Taylor for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Page 371 U.S. 21, 22
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
