LEVER BROTHERS CO. v. UNITED STATES, 371 U.S. 207 (1962)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

LEVER BROTHERS CO. v. UNITED STATES, 371 U.S. 207 (1962)

371 U.S. 207

LEVER BROTHERS CO. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. No. 487.
Decided December 10, 1962.

Appeal dismissed.

Abe Fortas, William L. McGovern, Abe Krash and Dennis G. Lyons for appellant.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger and Lionel Kestenbaum for the United States, and Richard W. Barrett for Procter & Gamble Co. et al., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed.

MR. JUSTICE STEWART took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 371 U.S. 207, 208

 


U.S. Supreme Court

LEVER BROTHERS CO. v. UNITED STATES, 371 U.S. 207 (1962)

371 U.S. 207

LEVER BROTHERS CO. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. No. 487.
Decided December 10, 1962.

Appeal dismissed.

Abe Fortas, William L. McGovern, Abe Krash and Dennis G. Lyons for appellant.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger and Lionel Kestenbaum for the United States, and Richard W. Barrett for Procter & Gamble Co. et al., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed.

MR. JUSTICE STEWART took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 371 U.S. 207, 208

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.