VITORATOS v. WALSH, 371 U.S. 114 (1962)
U.S. Supreme Court
VITORATOS v. WALSH, 371 U.S. 114 (1962) 371 U.S. 114 VITORATOS v. WALSH, MUNICIPAL COURT CLERK.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
No. 507, Misc.
Decided November 19, 1962.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
Reported below: 173 Ohio St. 467, 183 N.E.2d 917
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
U.S. Supreme Court
La ROSE v. TAHASH, 371 U.S. 114 (1962) 371 U.S. 114 La ROSE v. TAHASH, WARDEN.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MINNESOTA.
No. 445, Misc.
Decided November 19, 1962.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 262 Minn. 552, 115 N.W.2d 687.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
VITORATOS v. WALSH, 371 U.S. 114 (1962) 371 U.S. 114 VITORATOS v. WALSH, MUNICIPAL COURT CLERK.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
No. 507, Misc.
Decided November 19, 1962.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
Reported below: 173 Ohio St. 467, 183 N.E.2d 917
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
U.S. Supreme Court
La ROSE v. TAHASH, 371 U.S. 114 (1962) 371 U.S. 114 La ROSE v. TAHASH, WARDEN.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MINNESOTA.
No. 445, Misc.
Decided November 19, 1962.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 262 Minn. 552, 115 N.W.2d 687.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Page 371 U.S. 114, 115
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.