LASSITER v. UNITED STATES, 371 U.S. 10 (1962)

U.S. Supreme Court

LASSITER v. UNITED STATES, 371 U.S. 10 (1962)

371 U.S. 10

LASSITER ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. No. 116.
Decided October 8, 1962.

 203 F. Supp. 20, affirmed.

Jack P. F. Gremillion, Attorney General of Louisiana, George Ponder and William P. Schuler, Assistant Attorneys General, and Albin P. Lassiter for appellants.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Marshall, Howard A. Glickstein and Bernard A. Gould for the United States et al.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE WHITE and MR. JUSTICE GOLDBERG took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 371 U.S. 10, 11

 


U.S. Supreme Court

LASSITER v. UNITED STATES, 371 U.S. 10 (1962)

371 U.S. 10

LASSITER ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. No. 116.
Decided October 8, 1962.

 203 F. Supp. 20, affirmed.

Jack P. F. Gremillion, Attorney General of Louisiana, George Ponder and William P. Schuler, Assistant Attorneys General, and Albin P. Lassiter for appellants.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Marshall, Howard A. Glickstein and Bernard A. Gould for the United States et al.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE WHITE and MR. JUSTICE GOLDBERG took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 371 U.S. 10, 11

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.