ELCHUK v. UNITED STATES, 370 U.S. 722 (1962)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

ELCHUK v. UNITED STATES, 370 U.S. 722 (1962)

370 U.S. 722

ELCHUK v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 965, Misc.
Decided June 25, 1962.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; case remanded for further procedings.

Reported below: 296 F.2d 723.

Petitioner pro se.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. Upon the suggestion of the Solicitor General and an examination of the entire record, the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further proceedings in which the petitioner is to be accorded the opportunity to present oral argument on the merits of his appeal, either personally or through counsel, to the same extent as such opportunity is accorded to the United States Attorney.

MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 370 U.S. 722, 723




U.S. Supreme Court

ELCHUK v. UNITED STATES, 370 U.S. 722 (1962)

370 U.S. 722

ELCHUK v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 965, Misc.
Decided June 25, 1962.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; case remanded for further procedings.

Reported below: 296 F.2d 723.

Petitioner pro se.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. Upon the suggestion of the Solicitor General and an examination of the entire record, the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further proceedings in which the petitioner is to be accorded the opportunity to present oral argument on the merits of his appeal, either personally or through counsel, to the same extent as such opportunity is accorded to the United States Attorney.

MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 370 U.S. 722, 723

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.