CEPERO v. PUERTO RICO, 370 U.S. 289 (1962)
U.S. Supreme Court
CEPERO v. PUERTO RICO, 370 U.S. 289 (1962) 370 U.S. 289CEPERO v. PUERTO RICO ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN
DISTRICT OF
NEW YORK. No. 1336, Misc.
Decided June 18, 1962.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed.
MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
370 U.S. 289 (1962) 370 U.S. 289 (1962) ">
U.S. Supreme Court
KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO. v. REILY, 370 U.S. 289 (1962) 370 U.S. 289KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO. v. REILY, COLLECTOR OF REVENUE
OF
LOUISIANA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA. No. 918.
Decided June 18, 1962.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 242 La. 235, 135 So. 2d 915.
W. Scott Wilkinson, Milton W. Schober and Pike Hall, Jr. for appellant.
Emmett E. Batson for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. See National Leather Co. v. Massachusetts, 277 U.S. 413.
MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
U.S. Supreme Court
CEPERO v. PUERTO RICO, 370 U.S. 289 (1962) 370 U.S. 289 CEPERO v. PUERTO RICO ET AL.APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
NEW YORK. No. 1336, Misc.
Decided June 18, 1962.
PER CURIAM. The appeal is dismissed. MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. Page 370 U.S. 289, 290
370 U.S. 289 (1962) 370 U.S. 289 (1962) ">
U.S. Supreme Court
KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO. v. REILY, 370 U.S. 289 (1962) 370 U.S. 289 KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO. v. REILY, COLLECTOR OF REVENUE OFLOUISIANA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA. No. 918.
Decided June 18, 1962.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Reported below: 242 La. 235, 135 So. 2d 915. W. Scott Wilkinson, Milton W. Schober and Pike Hall, Jr. for appellant. Emmett E. Batson for appellee. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. See National Leather Co. v. Massachusetts, 277 U.S. 413. MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.