CEPERO v. PUERTO RICO, 370 U.S. 289 (1962)

U.S. Supreme Court

CEPERO v. PUERTO RICO, 370 U.S. 289 (1962)

370 U.S. 289

CEPERO v. PUERTO RICO ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
NEW YORK. No. 1336, Misc.
Decided June 18, 1962.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed.

MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 370 U.S. 289, 290


KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO. v. REILY, <a href="/cases/federal/us/370/289/case.html">370 U.S. 289</a> (1962) 370 U.S. 289 (1962) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO. v. REILY, 370 U.S. 289 (1962)

370 U.S. 289

KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO. v. REILY, COLLECTOR OF REVENUE OF
LOUISIANA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA. No. 918.
Decided June 18, 1962.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 242 La. 235, 135 So.2d 915.

W. Scott Wilkinson, Milton W. Schober and Pike Hall, Jr. for appellant.

Emmett E. Batson for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. See National Leather Co. v. Massachusetts, 277 U.S. 413.

MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.




U.S. Supreme Court

CEPERO v. PUERTO RICO, 370 U.S. 289 (1962)

370 U.S. 289

CEPERO v. PUERTO RICO ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
NEW YORK. No. 1336, Misc.
Decided June 18, 1962.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed.

MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 370 U.S. 289, 290


KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO. v. REILY, <a href="/cases/federal/us/370/289/case.html">370 U.S. 289</a> (1962) 370 U.S. 289 (1962) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO. v. REILY, 370 U.S. 289 (1962)

370 U.S. 289

KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO. v. REILY, COLLECTOR OF REVENUE OF
LOUISIANA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA. No. 918.
Decided June 18, 1962.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 242 La. 235, 135 So.2d 915.

W. Scott Wilkinson, Milton W. Schober and Pike Hall, Jr. for appellant.

Emmett E. Batson for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. See National Leather Co. v. Massachusetts, 277 U.S. 413.

MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.