WILLIAMS v. ZUCKERT, 369 U.S. 884 (1962)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

WILLIAMS v. ZUCKERT , 369 U.S. 884 (1962)

369 U.S. 884

Daniel Alton WILLIAMS, petitioner,
v.
Eugene M. ZUCKERT, Secretary of the Air Force, et al.
No. 1123, Misc.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 21, 1962

Sidney Dickstein, David I. Shapiro, Lawrence Speiser and Melvin Wulf, for petitioner.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Alan S. Rosenthal and Sherman L. Cohn, for respondents.

Motion for leave to proced in forma pauperis and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit granted. Case transferred to the appellate docket and placed on the summary calendar.[ Williams v. Zuckert 369 U.S. 884 (1962) ]


U.S. Supreme Court

WILLIAMS v. ZUCKERT , 369 U.S. 884 (1962)

369 U.S. 884

Daniel Alton WILLIAMS, petitioner,
v.
Eugene M. ZUCKERT, Secretary of the Air Force, et al.
No. 1123, Misc.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 21, 1962

Sidney Dickstein, David I. Shapiro, Lawrence Speiser and Melvin Wulf, for petitioner.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Alan S. Rosenthal and Sherman L. Cohn, for respondents.

Motion for leave to proced in forma pauperis and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit granted. Case transferred to the appellate docket and placed on the summary calendar.[ Williams v. Zuckert 369 U.S. 884 (1962) ]

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.