GARRETT v. UNITED STATES, 369 U.S. 662 (1962)

U.S. Supreme Court

GARRETT v. UNITED STATES, 369 U.S. 662 (1962)

369 U.S. 662

GARRETT v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. No. 773, Misc.
Decided May 14, 1962.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; case remanded for consideration in light of Coppedge v. United States, ante, p. 438.

Petitioner pro se.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg and Robert G. Maysack for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for consideration in light of Coppedge v. United States, ante, p. 438.

MR. JUSTICE CLARK and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinion in the Coppedge case.

MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 369 U.S. 662, 663




U.S. Supreme Court

GARRETT v. UNITED STATES, 369 U.S. 662 (1962)

369 U.S. 662

GARRETT v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. No. 773, Misc.
Decided May 14, 1962.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; case remanded for consideration in light of Coppedge v. United States, ante, p. 438.

Petitioner pro se.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg and Robert G. Maysack for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for consideration in light of Coppedge v. United States, ante, p. 438.

MR. JUSTICE CLARK and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinion in the Coppedge case.

MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 369 U.S. 662, 663

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.