SIMPSON v. UNITED STATES, 369 U.S. 526 (1962)
Syllabus
Decided April 30, 1962.
U.S. Supreme Court
SIMPSON v. UNITED STATES, 369 U.S. 526 (1962) 369 U.S. 526SIMPSON, DOING BUSINESS AS MID-SEVEN
TRANSPORTATION CO., v. UNITED STATES
ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN
DISTRICT OF
Decided April 30, 1962.
200 F. Supp. 372, affirmed.
D.C. Nolan for appellant.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger, Lionel Kestenbaum, Robert W. Ginnane and Francis A. Silver for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission, appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
THE CHIEF JUSTICE and MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Opinions
ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA. No. 748.
Decided April 30, 1962.
200 F. Supp. 372, affirmed. D.C. Nolan for appellant. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger, Lionel Kestenbaum, Robert W. Ginnane and Francis A. Silver for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission, appellees. PER CURIAM. The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. THE CHIEF JUSTICE and MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. Page 369 U.S. 526, 527
U.S. Supreme Court
SIMPSON v. UNITED STATES, 369 U.S. 526 (1962) 369 U.S. 526 SIMPSON, DOING BUSINESS AS MID-SEVEN TRANSPORTATION CO., v. UNITED STATESET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA. No. 748.
Decided April 30, 1962.
200 F. Supp. 372, affirmed. D.C. Nolan for appellant. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger, Lionel Kestenbaum, Robert W. Ginnane and Francis A. Silver for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission, appellees. PER CURIAM. The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. THE CHIEF JUSTICE and MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. Page 369 U.S. 526, 527
Search This Case
