SIMPSON v. UNITED STATES, 369 U.S. 526 (1962)

U.S. Supreme Court

SIMPSON v. UNITED STATES, 369 U.S. 526 (1962)

369 U.S. 526

SIMPSON, DOING BUSINESS AS MID-SEVEN TRANSPORTATION CO., v. UNITED STATES
ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF

IOWA.

 No. 748.
Decided April 30, 1962.

 200 F. Supp. 372, affirmed.

D.C. Nolan for appellant.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger, Lionel Kestenbaum, Robert W. Ginnane and Francis A. Silver for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission, appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE and MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 369 U.S. 526, 527

 


U.S. Supreme Court

SIMPSON v. UNITED STATES, 369 U.S. 526 (1962)

369 U.S. 526

SIMPSON, DOING BUSINESS AS MID-SEVEN TRANSPORTATION CO., v. UNITED STATES
ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF

IOWA.

 No. 748.
Decided April 30, 1962.

 200 F. Supp. 372, affirmed.

D.C. Nolan for appellant.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger, Lionel Kestenbaum, Robert W. Ginnane and Francis A. Silver for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission, appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE and MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 369 U.S. 526, 527

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.