RAGAN v. COX, 369 U.S. 437 (1962)
U.S. Supreme Court
RAGAN v. COX, 369 U.S. 437 (1962)
369 U.S. 437 RAGAN v. COX, COMMANDANT.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT. No. 634, Misc.
Decided April 23, 1962.
Certiorari granted; order of Court of Appeals vacated insofar as it denies petitioner leave to proceed in forma pauperis; case remanded to that court for further proceedings.
Petitioner pro se.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Marshall and Harold H. Greene for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
In accordance with the suggestion of the Solicitor General and upon consideration of the entire record, the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The order of the Court of Appeals, insofar as it denies petitioner leave to proceed in forma pauperis, is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further proceedings. Simcox v. Madigan, 366 U.S. 765.
MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
U.S. Supreme Court
RAGAN v. COX, 369 U.S. 437 (1962)
369 U.S. 437 RAGAN v. COX, COMMANDANT.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT. No. 634, Misc.
Decided April 23, 1962.
Certiorari granted; order of Court of Appeals vacated insofar as it denies petitioner leave to proceed in forma pauperis; case remanded to that court for further proceedings.
Petitioner pro se.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Marshall and Harold H. Greene for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
In accordance with the suggestion of the Solicitor General and upon consideration of the entire record, the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The order of the Court of Appeals, insofar as it denies petitioner leave to proceed in forma pauperis, is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further proceedings. Simcox v. Madigan, 366 U.S. 765.
MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Page 369 U.S. 437, 438
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
