RAGAN v. COX, 369 U.S. 437 (1962)

U.S. Supreme Court

RAGAN v. COX, 369 U.S. 437 (1962)

369 U.S. 437

RAGAN v. COX, COMMANDANT.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT. No. 634, Misc.
Decided April 23, 1962.

Certiorari granted; order of Court of Appeals vacated insofar as it denies petitioner leave to proceed in forma pauperis; case remanded to that court for further proceedings.

Petitioner pro se.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Marshall and Harold H. Greene for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

In accordance with the suggestion of the Solicitor General and upon consideration of the entire record, the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The order of the Court of Appeals, insofar as it denies petitioner leave to proceed in forma pauperis, is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further proceedings. Simcox v. Madigan, 366 U.S. 765.

MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 369 U.S. 437, 438

 


U.S. Supreme Court

RAGAN v. COX, 369 U.S. 437 (1962)

369 U.S. 437

RAGAN v. COX, COMMANDANT.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT. No. 634, Misc.
Decided April 23, 1962.

Certiorari granted; order of Court of Appeals vacated insofar as it denies petitioner leave to proceed in forma pauperis; case remanded to that court for further proceedings.

Petitioner pro se.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Marshall and Harold H. Greene for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

In accordance with the suggestion of the Solicitor General and upon consideration of the entire record, the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The order of the Court of Appeals, insofar as it denies petitioner leave to proceed in forma pauperis, is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further proceedings. Simcox v. Madigan, 366 U.S. 765.

MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 369 U.S. 437, 438

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.