WARREN v. LARSON, 369 U.S. 427 (1962)

U.S. Supreme Court

WARREN v. LARSON, 369 U.S. 427 (1962)

369 U.S. 427

WARREN v. LARSON, STATE TREASURER.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA.
No. 920, Misc.
Decided April 16, 1962.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 132 So.2d 177.

Walter Warren for appellant.

Richard W. Ervin, Attorney General of Florida, and Robert J. Kelly and Gerald Mager, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER and MR. JUSTICE WHITE took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 369 U.S. 427, 428




U.S. Supreme Court

WARREN v. LARSON, 369 U.S. 427 (1962)

369 U.S. 427

WARREN v. LARSON, STATE TREASURER.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA.
No. 920, Misc.
Decided April 16, 1962.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 132 So.2d 177.

Walter Warren for appellant.

Richard W. Ervin, Attorney General of Florida, and Robert J. Kelly and Gerald Mager, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER and MR. JUSTICE WHITE took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 369 U.S. 427, 428

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.