KERR STEAMSHIP CO., INC. v. UNITED STATES, 369 U.S. 422 (1962)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

KERR STEAMSHIP CO., INC. v. UNITED STATES, 369 U.S. 422 (1962)

369 U.S. 422

KERR STEAMSHIP CO., INC., ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 29.
Decided April 9, 1962.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; case remanded with instructions to dismiss the petition for review as moot.

Reported below: 284 F.2d 61.

Herman Goldman, Elkan Turk and Elkan Turk, Jr. for petitioners.

Solicitor General Cox and Robert E. Mitchell for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

Upon the respondents' suggestion of mootness, the petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated. The case is remanded to that court with instructions to dismiss the petition for review as moot.

Page 369 U.S. 422, 423




U.S. Supreme Court

KERR STEAMSHIP CO., INC. v. UNITED STATES, 369 U.S. 422 (1962)

369 U.S. 422

KERR STEAMSHIP CO., INC., ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 29.
Decided April 9, 1962.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; case remanded with instructions to dismiss the petition for review as moot.

Reported below: 284 F.2d 61.

Herman Goldman, Elkan Turk and Elkan Turk, Jr. for petitioners.

Solicitor General Cox and Robert E. Mitchell for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

Upon the respondents' suggestion of mootness, the petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated. The case is remanded to that court with instructions to dismiss the petition for review as moot.

Page 369 U.S. 422, 423

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.