MURPHY v. UNITED STATES, 369 U.S. 402 (1962)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

MURPHY v. UNITED STATES, 369 U.S. 402 (1962)

369 U.S. 402

MURPHY ET AL. v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 317.
Decided April 2, 1962.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; case remanded with instructions to dismiss the appeal.

Reported below: 290 F.2d 573.

Albert A. Fiok for petitioners.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit is vacated and the case is remanded to that court with instructions to dismiss the appeal. DiBella v. United States, 369 U.S. 121.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK dissents.

Page 369 U.S. 402, 403




U.S. Supreme Court

MURPHY v. UNITED STATES, 369 U.S. 402 (1962)

369 U.S. 402

MURPHY ET AL. v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 317.
Decided April 2, 1962.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; case remanded with instructions to dismiss the appeal.

Reported below: 290 F.2d 573.

Albert A. Fiok for petitioners.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit is vacated and the case is remanded to that court with instructions to dismiss the appeal. DiBella v. United States, 369 U.S. 121.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK dissents.

Page 369 U.S. 402, 403

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.