NEW YORK MOBILE HOMES ASSN. v. STECKEL, 369 U.S. 150 (1962)

U.S. Supreme Court

NEW YORK MOBILE HOMES ASSN. v. STECKEL, 369 U.S. 150 (1962)

369 U.S. 150

NEW YORK MOBILE HOMES ASSN. ET AL. v. STECKEL, SUPERVISOR OF THE TOWN OF
CHILI, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK. No. 609.
Decided March 19, 1962.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 9 N. Y. 2d 533, 175 N. E. 2d 151.

William L. Clay for appellants.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Paxton Blair, Solicitor General, and Ruth Kessler Toch, Assistant Solicitor General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE WHITTAKER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 369 U.S. 150, 151




U.S. Supreme Court

NEW YORK MOBILE HOMES ASSN. v. STECKEL, 369 U.S. 150 (1962)

369 U.S. 150

NEW YORK MOBILE HOMES ASSN. ET AL. v. STECKEL, SUPERVISOR OF THE TOWN OF
CHILI, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK. No. 609.
Decided March 19, 1962.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 9 N. Y. 2d 533, 175 N. E. 2d 151.

William L. Clay for appellants.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Paxton Blair, Solicitor General, and Ruth Kessler Toch, Assistant Solicitor General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE WHITTAKER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 369 U.S. 150, 151

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.