CEPERO v. RINCON DE GAUTIER, 368 U.S. 9 (1961)
U.S. Supreme Court
CEPERO v. RINCON DE GAUTIER, 368 U.S. 9 (1961) 368 U.S. 9 CEPERO v. RINCON DE GAUTIER, CITY MANAGER, SAN JUAN.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT
OF NEW YORK. No. 108, Misc.
Decided October 9, 1961.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed.
U.S. Supreme Court
CEPERO v. PUERTO RICO, 368 U.S. 9 (1961) 368 U.S. 9 CEPERO v. PUERTO RICO ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT
OF NEW YORK. No. 164, Misc.
Decided October 9, 1961.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed.
U.S. Supreme Court
CEPERO v. PUERTO RICO, 368 U.S. 9 (1961) 368 U.S. 9 CEPERO v. PUERTO RICO ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT
OF NEW YORK. No. 382, Misc.
Decided October 9, 1961.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed.
U.S. Supreme Court
CEPERO v. RINCON DE GAUTIER, 368 U.S. 9 (1961) 368 U.S. 9 CEPERO v. RINCON DE GAUTIER, CITY MANAGER, SAN JUAN.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT
OF NEW YORK. No. 108, Misc.
Decided October 9, 1961.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed.
U.S. Supreme Court
CEPERO v. PUERTO RICO, 368 U.S. 9 (1961) 368 U.S. 9 CEPERO v. PUERTO RICO ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT
OF NEW YORK. No. 164, Misc.
Decided October 9, 1961.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed.
U.S. Supreme Court
CEPERO v. PUERTO RICO, 368 U.S. 9 (1961) 368 U.S. 9 CEPERO v. PUERTO RICO ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT
OF NEW YORK. No. 382, Misc.
Decided October 9, 1961.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed.
Page 368 U.S. 9, 10
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.