KAVANAGH v. STENHOUSE, 368 U.S. 516 (1962)

U.S. Supreme Court

KAVANAGH v. STENHOUSE, 368 U.S. 516 (1962)

368 U.S. 516

KAVANAGH v. STENHOUSE.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF RHODE ISLAND.
No. 615.
Decided February 19, 1962.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: ___ R. I. ___, 174 A. 2d 560.

Aram K. Berberian for appellant.

J. Joseph Nugent, Attorney General of Rhode Island, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that further consideration of the question of jurisdiction should be postponed to a hearing of the case on the merits.


RAINSBERGER v. LEYPOLDT, <a href="/cases/federal/us/368/516/case.html">368 U.S. 516</a> (1962) 368 U.S. 516 (1962) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

RAINSBERGER v. LEYPOLDT, 368 U.S. 516 (1962)

368 U.S. 516

RAINSBERGER v. LEYPOLDT, SHERIFF.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA.
No. 835, Misc.
Decided February 19, 1962.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 77 Nev. 399, 365 P.2d 489.

Samuel S. Lionel for appellant.

John F. Mendoza and Charles L. Garner for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 368 U.S. 516, 517




U.S. Supreme Court

KAVANAGH v. STENHOUSE, 368 U.S. 516 (1962)

368 U.S. 516

KAVANAGH v. STENHOUSE.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF RHODE ISLAND.
No. 615.
Decided February 19, 1962.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: ___ R. I. ___, 174 A. 2d 560.

Aram K. Berberian for appellant.

J. Joseph Nugent, Attorney General of Rhode Island, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that further consideration of the question of jurisdiction should be postponed to a hearing of the case on the merits.


RAINSBERGER v. LEYPOLDT, <a href="/cases/federal/us/368/516/case.html">368 U.S. 516</a> (1962) 368 U.S. 516 (1962) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

RAINSBERGER v. LEYPOLDT, 368 U.S. 516 (1962)

368 U.S. 516

RAINSBERGER v. LEYPOLDT, SHERIFF.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA.
No. 835, Misc.
Decided February 19, 1962.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 77 Nev. 399, 365 P.2d 489.

Samuel S. Lionel for appellant.

John F. Mendoza and Charles L. Garner for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 368 U.S. 516, 517

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.