LYNN v. McELROY, 368 U.S. 5 (1961)
U.S. Supreme Court
LYNN v. McELROY, 368 U.S. 5 (1961) 368 U.S. 5 LYNN v. McELROY, CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT.
No. 104, Misc.
Decided October 9, 1961.
Appeal dismissed.
Reported below: 284 F.2d 299.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed.
U.S. Supreme Court
MILK TRANSPORT, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 368 U.S. 5 (1961) 368 U.S. 5 MILK TRANSPORT, INC., v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA.
No. 95.
Decided October 9, 1961.
190 F. Supp. 350, affirmed.
Perry R. Moore for appellant.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger, Richard A. Solomon, Robert W. Ginnane and Fritz R. Kahn for the United States et al.
Frank B. Hand, Jr. for Alterman Transport Lines, Inc., et al., intervenors, on motions to affirm the judgment.
PER CURIAM.
The motion of W. W. Hughes for leave to file brief, as amicus curiae, is denied. The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
U.S. Supreme Court
LYNN v. McELROY, 368 U.S. 5 (1961) 368 U.S. 5 LYNN v. McELROY, CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT.
No. 104, Misc.
Decided October 9, 1961.
Appeal dismissed.
Reported below: 284 F.2d 299.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed.
Page 368 U.S. 5, 6
U.S. Supreme Court
MILK TRANSPORT, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 368 U.S. 5 (1961) 368 U.S. 5 MILK TRANSPORT, INC., v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA.
No. 95.
Decided October 9, 1961.
190 F. Supp. 350, affirmed.
Perry R. Moore for appellant.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger, Richard A. Solomon, Robert W. Ginnane and Fritz R. Kahn for the United States et al.
Frank B. Hand, Jr. for Alterman Transport Lines, Inc., et al., intervenors, on motions to affirm the judgment.
PER CURIAM.
The motion of W. W. Hughes for leave to file brief, as amicus curiae, is denied. The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
