LYNN v. McELROY, 368 U.S. 5 (1961)

Syllabus

U.S. Supreme Court

LYNN v. McELROY, 368 U.S. 5 (1961) 368 U.S. 5

LYNN v. McELROY, CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT.
No. 104, Misc.
Decided October 9, 1961.

Appeal dismissed.

Reported below: 284 F.2d 299.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed.

Page 368 U.S. 5, 6


368 U.S. 5 (1961) 368 U.S. 5 (1961) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

MILK TRANSPORT, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 368 U.S. 5 (1961) 368 U.S. 5

MILK TRANSPORT, INC., v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA.
No. 95.
Decided October 9, 1961.

 190 F. Supp. 350, affirmed.

Perry R. Moore for appellant.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger, Richard A. Solomon, Robert W. Ginnane and Fritz R. Kahn for the United States et al.

Frank B. Hand, Jr. for Alterman Transport Lines, Inc., et al., intervenors, on motions to affirm the judgment.

PER CURIAM.

The motion of W. W. Hughes for leave to file brief, as amicus curiae, is denied. The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

 



Opinions

U.S. Supreme Court

LYNN v. McELROY, 368 U.S. 5 (1961) 368 U.S. 5 LYNN v. McELROY, CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT.
No. 104, Misc.
Decided October 9, 1961.

Appeal dismissed.

Reported below: 284 F.2d 299.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed.

Page 368 U.S. 5, 6


368 U.S. 5 (1961) 368 U.S. 5 (1961) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

MILK TRANSPORT, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 368 U.S. 5 (1961) 368 U.S. 5 MILK TRANSPORT, INC., v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA.
No. 95.
Decided October 9, 1961.

 190 F. Supp. 350, affirmed.

Perry R. Moore for appellant.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger, Richard A. Solomon, Robert W. Ginnane and Fritz R. Kahn for the United States et al.

Frank B. Hand, Jr. for Alterman Transport Lines, Inc., et al., intervenors, on motions to affirm the judgment.

PER CURIAM.

The motion of W. W. Hughes for leave to file brief, as amicus curiae, is denied. The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.