LABOR BOARD v. LOCAL 476, 368 U.S. 401 (1962)

U.S. Supreme Court

LABOR BOARD v. LOCAL 476, 368 U.S. 401 (1962)

368 U.S. 401

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. LOCAL 476, UNITED ASSOCIATION OF
JOURNEYMEN OF THE PLUMBING AND PIPEFITTING INDUSTRY, AFL-CIO, ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT. No. 39.
Decided January 15, 1962.

Certiorari granted; judgment reversed and case remanded to the Court of Appeals to enter judgment affirming and enforcing a cease-and-desist order of the National Labor Relations Board - without deletion of references to other employers and other persons.

Reported below: 280 F.2d 441; 283 F.2d 26.

Solicitor General Rankin, Stuart Rothman, Dominick L. Manoli and Norton J. Come for petitioner.

Martin F. O'Donoghue for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. In unfair labor practice proceedings before the National Labor Relations Board respondents did not except to the terms of an order directing them to cease and desist from certain practices found to violate 8 (b) (4) (A) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. 158 (b) (4) (A), as regards the employees of a named employer "or any other employer" where an object is to force or require the named employer "or any other employer or person" to cease doing business with a named primary contractor. The Court of Appeals in enforcement proceedings modified the order, among other ways, by striking the references to "any other employer" and to "any other employer or person." 283 F.2d 26. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed and the case is remanded with directions that a judgment be entered

Page 368 U.S. 401, 402

which affirms and enforces the Board order after restoring these deleted provisions. Labor Board v. Cheney California Lumber Co., 327 U.S. 385; 10 (e), 49 Stat. 454, as amended, 29 U.S.C. 160 (e). See also Labor Board v. Ochoa Fertilizer Corp., ante, p. 318.




U.S. Supreme Court

LABOR BOARD v. LOCAL 476, 368 U.S. 401 (1962)

368 U.S. 401

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. LOCAL 476, UNITED ASSOCIATION OF
JOURNEYMEN OF THE PLUMBING AND PIPEFITTING INDUSTRY, AFL-CIO, ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT. No. 39.
Decided January 15, 1962.

Certiorari granted; judgment reversed and case remanded to the Court of Appeals to enter judgment affirming and enforcing a cease-and-desist order of the National Labor Relations Board - without deletion of references to other employers and other persons.

Reported below: 280 F.2d 441; 283 F.2d 26.

Solicitor General Rankin, Stuart Rothman, Dominick L. Manoli and Norton J. Come for petitioner.

Martin F. O'Donoghue for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. In unfair labor practice proceedings before the National Labor Relations Board respondents did not except to the terms of an order directing them to cease and desist from certain practices found to violate 8 (b) (4) (A) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. 158 (b) (4) (A), as regards the employees of a named employer "or any other employer" where an object is to force or require the named employer "or any other employer or person" to cease doing business with a named primary contractor. The Court of Appeals in enforcement proceedings modified the order, among other ways, by striking the references to "any other employer" and to "any other employer or person." 283 F.2d 26. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed and the case is remanded with directions that a judgment be entered

Page 368 U.S. 401, 402

which affirms and enforces the Board order after restoring these deleted provisions. Labor Board v. Cheney California Lumber Co., 327 U.S. 385; 10 (e), 49 Stat. 454, as amended, 29 U.S.C. 160 (e). See also Labor Board v. Ochoa Fertilizer Corp., ante, p. 318.

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.