NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD CO. v. UNITED STATES, 368 U.S. 349 (1962)

U.S. Supreme Court

NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD CO. v. UNITED STATES, 368 U.S. 349 (1962)

368 U.S. 349

NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD CO. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT
OF NEW YORK. No. 482.
Decided January 8, 1962.

194 F. Supp. 947, affirmed.

Robert D. Brooks and Alfred A. Green for appellant.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger, Lionel Kestenbaum, Elliott H. Moyer and Robert W. Ginnane for the United States et al., and Clyde B. Aitchison, John R. Turney, Frederick A. Babson, Jr. and John H. Eisenhart, Jr. for the National Freight Traffic Assn., Inc., et al., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

SAVE WAY NORTHERN BOULEVARD, INC. v. NEW YORK, <a href="/cases/federal/us/368/349/case.html">368 U.S. 349</a> (1962) 368 U.S. 349 (1962) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

SAVE WAY NORTHERN BOULEVARD, INC. v. NEW YORK, 368 U.S. 349 (1962)

368 U.S. 349

SAVE WAY NORTHERN BOULEVARD, INC., v. NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 517.
Decided January 8, 1962.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 10 N. Y. 2d 727, 748, 176 N. E. 2d 839, 177 N. E. 2d 47.

Harold H. Levin and Larry M. Lavinsky for appellant.

Leo A. Larkin and Seymour B. Quel for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 368 U.S. 349, 350




U.S. Supreme Court

NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD CO. v. UNITED STATES, 368 U.S. 349 (1962)

368 U.S. 349

NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD CO. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT
OF NEW YORK. No. 482.
Decided January 8, 1962.

194 F. Supp. 947, affirmed.

Robert D. Brooks and Alfred A. Green for appellant.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger, Lionel Kestenbaum, Elliott H. Moyer and Robert W. Ginnane for the United States et al., and Clyde B. Aitchison, John R. Turney, Frederick A. Babson, Jr. and John H. Eisenhart, Jr. for the National Freight Traffic Assn., Inc., et al., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

SAVE WAY NORTHERN BOULEVARD, INC. v. NEW YORK, <a href="/cases/federal/us/368/349/case.html">368 U.S. 349</a> (1962) 368 U.S. 349 (1962) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

SAVE WAY NORTHERN BOULEVARD, INC. v. NEW YORK, 368 U.S. 349 (1962)

368 U.S. 349

SAVE WAY NORTHERN BOULEVARD, INC., v. NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 517.
Decided January 8, 1962.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 10 N. Y. 2d 727, 748, 176 N. E. 2d 839, 177 N. E. 2d 47.

Harold H. Levin and Larry M. Lavinsky for appellant.

Leo A. Larkin and Seymour B. Quel for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 368 U.S. 349, 350

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.