NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD CO. v. UNITED STATES, 368 U.S. 349 (1962)
U.S. Supreme Court
NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD CO. v. UNITED STATES, 368 U.S. 349 (1962) 368 U.S. 349 NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD CO. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT
OF NEW YORK. No. 482.
Decided January 8, 1962.
194 F. Supp. 947, affirmed.
Robert D. Brooks and Alfred A. Green for appellant.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger, Lionel Kestenbaum, Elliott H. Moyer and Robert W. Ginnane for the United States et al., and Clyde B. Aitchison, John R. Turney, Frederick A. Babson, Jr. and John H. Eisenhart, Jr. for the National Freight Traffic Assn., Inc., et al., appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
U.S. Supreme Court
SAVE WAY NORTHERN BOULEVARD, INC. v. NEW YORK, 368 U.S. 349 (1962) 368 U.S. 349 SAVE WAY NORTHERN BOULEVARD, INC., v. NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 517.
Decided January 8, 1962.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 10 N.Y.2d 727, 748, 176 N.E.2d 839, 177 N. E. 2d 47.
Harold H. Levin and Larry M. Lavinsky for appellant.
Leo A. Larkin and Seymour B. Quel for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD CO. v. UNITED STATES, 368 U.S. 349 (1962) 368 U.S. 349 NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD CO. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT
OF NEW YORK. No. 482.
Decided January 8, 1962.
194 F. Supp. 947, affirmed.
Robert D. Brooks and Alfred A. Green for appellant.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger, Lionel Kestenbaum, Elliott H. Moyer and Robert W. Ginnane for the United States et al., and Clyde B. Aitchison, John R. Turney, Frederick A. Babson, Jr. and John H. Eisenhart, Jr. for the National Freight Traffic Assn., Inc., et al., appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
U.S. Supreme Court
SAVE WAY NORTHERN BOULEVARD, INC. v. NEW YORK, 368 U.S. 349 (1962) 368 U.S. 349 SAVE WAY NORTHERN BOULEVARD, INC., v. NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 517.
Decided January 8, 1962.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 10 N.Y.2d 727, 748, 176 N.E.2d 839, 177 N. E. 2d 47.
Harold H. Levin and Larry M. Lavinsky for appellant.
Leo A. Larkin and Seymour B. Quel for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Page 368 U.S. 349, 350
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
