VENUS v. UNITED STATES, 368 U.S. 345 (1961)

U.S. Supreme Court

VENUS v. UNITED STATES, 368 U.S. 345 (1961)

368 U.S. 345

VENUS v. UNITED STATES.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT.
No. 75.
Argued December 14, 1961.
Decided December 18, 1961.

Judgment reversed with instructions to dismiss the indictment.

Reported below: 287 F.2d 304.

Hayden C. Covington argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioner.

Jerome M. Feit argued the cause for the United States. With him on the briefs were Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller and Beatrice Rosenberg.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is reversed with instructions to dismiss the indictment. Ward v. United States, 344 U.S. 924, reversing 195 F.2d 441 (C. A. 5th Cir.).


DUTTON v. TAWES, <a href="/cases/federal/us/368/345/case.html">368 U.S. 345</a> (1961) 368 U.S. 345 (1961) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

DUTTON v. TAWES, 368 U.S. 345 (1961)

368 U.S. 345

DUTTON ET AL. v. TAWES, GOVERNOR OF MARYLAND.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND.
No. 533.
Decided December 18, 1961.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 225 Md. 484, 171 A. 2d 688.

Hyman A. Pressman for appellants.

Thomas B. Finan, Attorney General of Maryland, and Joseph S. Kaufman, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 368 U.S. 345, 346




U.S. Supreme Court

VENUS v. UNITED STATES, 368 U.S. 345 (1961)

368 U.S. 345

VENUS v. UNITED STATES.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT.
No. 75.
Argued December 14, 1961.
Decided December 18, 1961.

Judgment reversed with instructions to dismiss the indictment.

Reported below: 287 F.2d 304.

Hayden C. Covington argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioner.

Jerome M. Feit argued the cause for the United States. With him on the briefs were Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller and Beatrice Rosenberg.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is reversed with instructions to dismiss the indictment. Ward v. United States, 344 U.S. 924, reversing 195 F.2d 441 (C. A. 5th Cir.).


DUTTON v. TAWES, <a href="/cases/federal/us/368/345/case.html">368 U.S. 345</a> (1961) 368 U.S. 345 (1961) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

DUTTON v. TAWES, 368 U.S. 345 (1961)

368 U.S. 345

DUTTON ET AL. v. TAWES, GOVERNOR OF MARYLAND.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND.
No. 533.
Decided December 18, 1961.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 225 Md. 484, 171 A. 2d 688.

Hyman A. Pressman for appellants.

Thomas B. Finan, Attorney General of Maryland, and Joseph S. Kaufman, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 368 U.S. 345, 346

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.