CHOBOT v. WISCONSIN, 368 U.S. 15 (1961)

U.S. Supreme Court

CHOBOT v. WISCONSIN, 368 U.S. 15 (1961)

368 U.S. 15

CHOBOT v. WISCONSIN.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN.
No. 146.
Decided October 23, 1961.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 12 Wis. 2d 110, 106 N. W. 2d 286.

Max Raskin for appellant.

John W. Reynolds, Attorney General of Wisconsin, William Platz, Assistant Attorney General, and William J. McCauley for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK, MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.


KATZ v. SINGERMAN, <a href="/cases/federal/us/368/15/case.html">368 U.S. 15</a> (1961) 368 U.S. 15 (1961) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

KATZ v. SINGERMAN, 368 U.S. 15 (1961)

368 U.S. 15

KATZ ET AL v. SINGERMAN ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA.
No. 298.
Decided October 23, 1961.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 241 La. 103, 127 So.2d 515.

G. Wray Gill and Gerard H. Schreiber for appellants.

Robert Weinstein and Herman L. Midlo for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 368 U.S. 15, 16




U.S. Supreme Court

CHOBOT v. WISCONSIN, 368 U.S. 15 (1961)

368 U.S. 15

CHOBOT v. WISCONSIN.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN.
No. 146.
Decided October 23, 1961.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 12 Wis. 2d 110, 106 N. W. 2d 286.

Max Raskin for appellant.

John W. Reynolds, Attorney General of Wisconsin, William Platz, Assistant Attorney General, and William J. McCauley for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK, MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.


KATZ v. SINGERMAN, <a href="/cases/federal/us/368/15/case.html">368 U.S. 15</a> (1961) 368 U.S. 15 (1961) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

KATZ v. SINGERMAN, 368 U.S. 15 (1961)

368 U.S. 15

KATZ ET AL v. SINGERMAN ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA.
No. 298.
Decided October 23, 1961.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 241 La. 103, 127 So.2d 515.

G. Wray Gill and Gerard H. Schreiber for appellants.

Robert Weinstein and Herman L. Midlo for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 368 U.S. 15, 16

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.