LINNABERY v. IOWA, 368 U.S. 143 (1961)
U.S. Supreme Court
LINNABERY v. IOWA, 368 U.S. 143 (1961)
368 U.S. 143 LINNABERY ET AL. v. IOWA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA.
No. 26, Misc.
Decided December 4, 1961.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
Appellants pro se.
Evan Hultman, Attorney General of Iowa, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
U.S. Supreme Court
UNION CARTAGE CO. v. UNITED STATES, 368 U.S. 143 (1961)
368 U.S. 143 UNION CARTAGE CO. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF
MASSACHUSETTS. No. 448.
Decided December 4, 1961.
193 F. Supp. 645, affirmed.
Earl R. Stanley for appellant.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger, Richard A. Solomon and Robert W. Ginnane for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
U.S. Supreme Court
LINNABERY v. IOWA, 368 U.S. 143 (1961)
368 U.S. 143 LINNABERY ET AL. v. IOWA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA.
No. 26, Misc.
Decided December 4, 1961.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
Appellants pro se.
Evan Hultman, Attorney General of Iowa, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
U.S. Supreme Court
UNION CARTAGE CO. v. UNITED STATES, 368 U.S. 143 (1961)
368 U.S. 143 UNION CARTAGE CO. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF
MASSACHUSETTS. No. 448.
Decided December 4, 1961.
193 F. Supp. 645, affirmed.
Earl R. Stanley for appellant.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger, Richard A. Solomon and Robert W. Ginnane for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
