DENNY v. BUSH, 367 U.S. 908 (1961)
U.S. Supreme Court
DENNY v. BUSH, 367 U.S. 908 (1961)
367 U.S. 908 DENNY ET AL. v. BUSH ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
LOUISIANA. No. 868.
Decided June 19, 1961.
191 F. Supp. 871, affirmed.
Gerard A. Rault for appellants.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Marshall and Harold H. Greene for the United States, as amicus curiae, urging affirmance.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
U.S. Supreme Court
LEGISLATURE OF LOUISIANA v. UNITED STATES, 367 U.S. 908 (1961)
367 U.S. 908 LEGISLATURE OF LOUISIANA ET AL. v. UNITED STATES.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
LOUISIANA. No. 967.
Decided June 19, 1961.
191 F. Supp. 871, affirmed.
W. Scott Wilkinson and Thompson L. Clarke for appellants.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Marshall and Harold H. Greene for the United States.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
U.S. Supreme Court
DENNY v. BUSH, 367 U.S. 908 (1961)
367 U.S. 908 DENNY ET AL. v. BUSH ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
LOUISIANA. No. 868.
Decided June 19, 1961.
191 F. Supp. 871, affirmed.
Gerard A. Rault for appellants.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Marshall and Harold H. Greene for the United States, as amicus curiae, urging affirmance.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
U.S. Supreme Court
LEGISLATURE OF LOUISIANA v. UNITED STATES, 367 U.S. 908 (1961)
367 U.S. 908 LEGISLATURE OF LOUISIANA ET AL. v. UNITED STATES.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
LOUISIANA. No. 967.
Decided June 19, 1961.
191 F. Supp. 871, affirmed.
W. Scott Wilkinson and Thompson L. Clarke for appellants.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Marshall and Harold H. Greene for the United States.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
