CONNER v. SIMLER, 367 U.S. 486 (1961)

U.S. Supreme Court

CONNER v. SIMLER, 367 U.S. 486 (1961)

367 U.S. 486

CONNER v. SIMLER.
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING.
No. 685.
Decided June 12, 1961.

Rehearing and certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Reported below: 282 F.2d 382.

Peyton Ford for petitioner.

John B. Ogden for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for rehearing is granted. The order entered March 20, 1961, 365 U.S. 844, denying the petition for writ of certiorari is vacated and the petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in the light of Southard v. MacDonald, 360 P.2d 940.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE, MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS dissent from vacation of the Court of Appeals judgment which held that the respondent Simler was entitled to have the facts of his case in the United States District Court determined by a jury as we believe is required by Rule 38 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, our prior decisions and the Seventh Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.

Page 367 U.S. 486, 487




U.S. Supreme Court

CONNER v. SIMLER, 367 U.S. 486 (1961)

367 U.S. 486

CONNER v. SIMLER.
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING.
No. 685.
Decided June 12, 1961.

Rehearing and certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Reported below: 282 F.2d 382.

Peyton Ford for petitioner.

John B. Ogden for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for rehearing is granted. The order entered March 20, 1961, 365 U.S. 844, denying the petition for writ of certiorari is vacated and the petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in the light of Southard v. MacDonald, 360 P.2d 940.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE, MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS dissent from vacation of the Court of Appeals judgment which held that the respondent Simler was entitled to have the facts of his case in the United States District Court determined by a jury as we believe is required by Rule 38 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, our prior decisions and the Seventh Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.

Page 367 U.S. 486, 487

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.