HERRIN TRANSPORTATION CO. v. UNITED STATES, 366 U.S. 419 (1961)
U.S. Supreme Court
HERRIN TRANSPORTATION CO. v. UNITED STATES, 366 U.S. 419 (1961)
366 U.S. 419 HERRIN TRANSPORTATION CO. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
TEXAS. No. 837.
Decided May 22, 1961.
186 F. Supp. 777, affirmed.
Carl L. Phinney for appellant.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger, Richard A. Solomon, Robert W. Ginnane and James Y. Piper for the United States, and Ewell H. Muse, Jr. for Strickland Transportation Co., appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
U.S. Supreme Court
HERRIN TRANSPORTATION CO. v. UNITED STATES, 366 U.S. 419 (1961)
366 U.S. 419 HERRIN TRANSPORTATION CO. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
TEXAS. No. 837.
Decided May 22, 1961.
186 F. Supp. 777, affirmed.
Carl L. Phinney for appellant.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger, Richard A. Solomon, Robert W. Ginnane and James Y. Piper for the United States, and Ewell H. Muse, Jr. for Strickland Transportation Co., appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Page 366 U.S. 419, 420
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.