BOND v. GREEN, 366 U.S. 271 (1961)

U.S. Supreme Court

BOND v. GREEN, 366 U.S. 271 (1961)

366 U.S. 271

BOND v. GREEN, CORRECTIONAL SUPERINTENDENT.
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS.
No. 1, Misc.
Decided May 15, 1961.

Motion for leave to file petition for habeas corpus denied; certiorari granted; judgment vacated and case remanded.

Reported below: See 174 F. Supp. 368.

Petitioner pro se.

Mark McElroy, Attorney General of Ohio, and William M. Vance, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to file petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. Treating the papers submitted as a petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Ohio, certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in the light of Smith v. Bennett, and Marshall v. Bennett, 365 U.S. 708.

MR. JUSTICE STEWART took no part in the consideration or disposition of this case.

Page 366 U.S. 271, 272

 


U.S. Supreme Court

BOND v. GREEN, 366 U.S. 271 (1961)

366 U.S. 271

BOND v. GREEN, CORRECTIONAL SUPERINTENDENT.
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS.
No. 1, Misc.
Decided May 15, 1961.

Motion for leave to file petition for habeas corpus denied; certiorari granted; judgment vacated and case remanded.

Reported below: See 174 F. Supp. 368.

Petitioner pro se.

Mark McElroy, Attorney General of Ohio, and William M. Vance, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to file petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. Treating the papers submitted as a petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Ohio, certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in the light of Smith v. Bennett, and Marshall v. Bennett, 365 U.S. 708.

MR. JUSTICE STEWART took no part in the consideration or disposition of this case.

Page 366 U.S. 271, 272

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.