SMITH v. SMITH, 366 U.S. 210 (1961)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

SMITH v. SMITH, 366 U.S. 210 (1961)

366 U.S. 210

SMITH v. SMITH.
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF RALEIGH COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA.
No. 802.
Decided May 1, 1961.

Appeal dismissed since the judgment below is based on a nonfederal ground adequate to support it.

J. W. Maxwell for appellant.

Harold Henkel Smith for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the reason that the judgment of the Circuit Court of Raleigh County, State of West Virginia, sought here to be reviewed, is based upon a nonfederal ground adequate to support it.

Page 366 U.S. 210, 211




U.S. Supreme Court

SMITH v. SMITH, 366 U.S. 210 (1961)

366 U.S. 210

SMITH v. SMITH.
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF RALEIGH COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA.
No. 802.
Decided May 1, 1961.

Appeal dismissed since the judgment below is based on a nonfederal ground adequate to support it.

J. W. Maxwell for appellant.

Harold Henkel Smith for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the reason that the judgment of the Circuit Court of Raleigh County, State of West Virginia, sought here to be reviewed, is based upon a nonfederal ground adequate to support it.

Page 366 U.S. 210, 211

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.