CHAIFETZ v. UNITED STATES, 366 U.S. 209 (1961)

U.S. Supreme Court

CHAIFETZ v. UNITED STATES, 366 U.S. 209 (1961)

366 U.S. 209

CHAIFETZ v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. No. 695.
Decided May 1, 1961.

Certiorari granted and judgment reversed only as to Count IV of the indictment.

Reported below: 109 U.S. App. D.C. 349, 288 F.2d 133.

Abraham Chaifetz and I. William Stempil for petitioner.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Oberdorfer and Meyer Rothwacks for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the entire record and the suggestion of the Solicitor General, the petition for writ of certiorari is granted limited to that part of the judgment concerned with Count IV of the indictment and that part of the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded to the District Court with directions to vacate the conviction on that Count. In all other respects the petition for writ of certiorari is denied.

Page 366 U.S. 209, 210




U.S. Supreme Court

CHAIFETZ v. UNITED STATES, 366 U.S. 209 (1961)

366 U.S. 209

CHAIFETZ v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. No. 695.
Decided May 1, 1961.

Certiorari granted and judgment reversed only as to Count IV of the indictment.

Reported below: 109 U.S. App. D.C. 349, 288 F.2d 133.

Abraham Chaifetz and I. William Stempil for petitioner.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Oberdorfer and Meyer Rothwacks for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the entire record and the suggestion of the Solicitor General, the petition for writ of certiorari is granted limited to that part of the judgment concerned with Count IV of the indictment and that part of the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded to the District Court with directions to vacate the conviction on that Count. In all other respects the petition for writ of certiorari is denied.

Page 366 U.S. 209, 210

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.