ANDERSON v. ALABAMA, 366 U.S. 208 (1961)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

ANDERSON v. ALABAMA, 366 U.S. 208 (1961)

366 U.S. 208

ANDERSON v. ALABAMA.
CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF ALABAMA.
No. 326.
Argued April 25-26, 1961.
Decided May 1, 1961.

270 Ala. 575, 120 So. 2d 414, reversed.

Jack Greenberg argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Peter A. Hall, Fred D. Gray, Orzell Billingsley and Thurgood Marshall.

David W. Clark, Assistant Attorney General of Alabama, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the briefs was MacDonald Gallion, Attorney General.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is reversed. Pierre v. Louisiana, 306 U.S. 354; Cassell v. Texas, 339 U.S. 282; Hernandez v. Texas, 347 U.S. 475.

Page 366 U.S. 208, 209

 


U.S. Supreme Court

ANDERSON v. ALABAMA, 366 U.S. 208 (1961)

366 U.S. 208

ANDERSON v. ALABAMA.
CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF ALABAMA.
No. 326.
Argued April 25-26, 1961.
Decided May 1, 1961.

270 Ala. 575, 120 So. 2d 414, reversed.

Jack Greenberg argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Peter A. Hall, Fred D. Gray, Orzell Billingsley and Thurgood Marshall.

David W. Clark, Assistant Attorney General of Alabama, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the briefs was MacDonald Gallion, Attorney General.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is reversed. Pierre v. Louisiana, 306 U.S. 354; Cassell v. Texas, 339 U.S. 282; Hernandez v. Texas, 347 U.S. 475.

Page 366 U.S. 208, 209

Oral Argument - April 25, 1961
Oral Argument - April 26, 1961
Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.