ATCHLEY v. CALIFORNIA, 366 U.S. 207 (1961)

U.S. Supreme Court

ATCHLEY v. CALIFORNIA, 366 U.S. 207 (1961)

366 U.S. 207

ATCHLEY v. CALIFORNIA.
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 95.
Argued April 25, 1961.
Decided May 1, 1961.

Certiorari dismissed as not warranted on record.

Reported below: 53 Cal. 2d 160, 346 P.2d 764.

Rosalie S. Asher argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioner.

Doris H. Maier, Deputy Attorney General of California, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the briefs was Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California.

PER CURIAM.

After hearing oral argument and fully examining the record, we conclude that the totality of circumstances as the record makes them manifest did not warrant bringing the case here. Accordingly, the writ is dismissed.

Page 366 U.S. 207, 208




U.S. Supreme Court

ATCHLEY v. CALIFORNIA, 366 U.S. 207 (1961)

366 U.S. 207

ATCHLEY v. CALIFORNIA.
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 95.
Argued April 25, 1961.
Decided May 1, 1961.

Certiorari dismissed as not warranted on record.

Reported below: 53 Cal. 2d 160, 346 P.2d 764.

Rosalie S. Asher argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioner.

Doris H. Maier, Deputy Attorney General of California, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the briefs was Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California.

PER CURIAM.

After hearing oral argument and fully examining the record, we conclude that the totality of circumstances as the record makes them manifest did not warrant bringing the case here. Accordingly, the writ is dismissed.

Page 366 U.S. 207, 208

Oral Argument - April 25, 1961 (Part 1)
Oral Argument - April 25, 1961 (Part 2)
Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.