U.S. v. UNION CENTRAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY., 365 U.S. 858 (1961)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

U.S. v. UNION CENTRAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY. , 365 U.S. 858 (1961)

365 U.S. 858

UNITED STATES, petitioner,
v.
UNION CENTRAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY.
No. 722.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 27, 1961

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Oberdorfer, and I. Henry Kutz and Fred E. Young-

Page 365 U.S. 858 , 859

man, for the United States.

H. William Butler, for respondent.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Michigan granted and case transferred to the summary calendar.


U.S. Supreme Court

U.S. v. UNION CENTRAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY. , 365 U.S. 858 (1961)

365 U.S. 858

UNITED STATES, petitioner,
v.
UNION CENTRAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY.
No. 722.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 27, 1961

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Oberdorfer, and I. Henry Kutz and Fred E. Young-

Page 365 U.S. 858 , 859

man, for the United States.

H. William Butler, for respondent.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Michigan granted and case transferred to the summary calendar.

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.